So some women are offended by cat-calling and chivalry. I’m not offended by cat-calling..in fact I take any cat calling as a compliment..BUT I’m not the only person in the world and if some people are offended by cat calling then it is true that cat callers should stop.
Now that we have agreed on that I just want to say I AM OFFENDED BY FEMINISM AND FEMINISTS!! I’m totally offended by them, I’m offended that they claim to represent women and I’m offended by EVERYTHING that comes out of a feminists persons mouth. I’m offended that they exist, I’m offended by the world feminism and feminist.
I know YOU arent offended by it but I am ..so please be considerate and stop being a feminists! It offends me!
So today on the way home my daughter wanted to feed ducks. We were coming back from a doctors appointment. Usually in the Netherlands they say not to feed the ducks as it is unhealthy for them, but she was so excited to do it so we did.
There were two cookies lefts, I broke on into pieces and gave her to feed the ducks. She took the entire cookie and threw all the pieces into the pond. This annoyed me because there were eleven ducks and the reason I broke the cookie into piece was because I wanted them each to get some of the cookie. By throwing all the pieces into the pond at one spot only three or four ducks had access to the cookies. So I changed my approach. With the second cookie. I gave her one piece at a time, but she still managed to out smart me. You see she simply is not attached to the concept that all the ducks must be fed equally so she threw each piece of cookie into the pond at exactly the same spot. The result was a duck fight, which one duck won and that duck ended up eating most of the cookie. Many of the ducks got nothing at all.
To me my daughter is mother nature in this story. Nature is not at all concerned with the idea that we should all be fed and for a very good reason: it seeks the best not necessarily the nicest group. Liberalism and Feminism are both anti-nature in this sense. Feminism would see the fight between the ducks call it patriarchy and claim that the very best thing would be for none of the ducks to fight, for them to create a culture of sharing and waiting one’s turn. And that can work if all the ducks play by the rule..BUT the moment one duck says no, this culture falls back to nature.
The anti war idea only works if we all play along and us all playing along REQUIRES feminist and liberal cultures to enforce VERY strict cultural norms on us. It requires these cultures to demonize those that compete and win. It requires them to create a false narrative of white oppressors, of evil winners. The ducks who got the cookie pieces are in no way evil, they are simply good at natures game. They did well and received the prize of the cookie in return. Instead of honoring that liberals view the world through the eyes of the parent.. they want all ducks to be fed so they demonize the strongest ducks in an attempt to stop them from getting a head. The problem is that this approach really will only ever work once the ducks arent very hungry. Because when the strong ducks are hungry no one cares what the liberals and feminist have to say.
EDIT** On reading this over I see that I compare feminism to a somewhat socialist movement with their desire for everything to be fair. That is unfair to them as I dont think they are really socialist in fact the society they desire is more free and capitalistically designed than patriarchy is. It still does require everyone to play along though.
A very common online response from feminists to anti-feminists is ..you dont know feminism is. Please read the dictionary. I think that anti feminists need to start using the dictionary definition of feminism to show feminists that feminism is NO different from racism.
From googleing “Feminism definition” we get
the advocacy of women’s rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes.
So feminism is the advocacy of women’s right on the grounds of equality of the sexes. I personally do not want or care about equality between the sexes but if you do then,
—Question number 1) Why only advocate for women’s rights on the grounds of equality? Why not be an egalitarian instead? Why discriminate against half the population and not also advocate for them? If your response is because women have it worse, although we totally disagree on that I will play along. How does women having it worse mean that you should ONLY advocate for them? Why not just advocate for whoever happens to not have their rights and in a case where women have it worse it would natural result in more advocating for women. Why define an entire movement on excluding men?
believing in or based on the principle that all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities
Why not be that instead? As far as I see the only logical reason is because you suffer from the same thing racists do: BIAS!!!
—Question number 2) If you really want the SAME rights as men why do you advocate for things like abortion for women without advocating for men being able to opt out of fatherhood? Why do you adovate for funding young girls who want to enter STEM fields and not young men. Maybe you need to look up the definitions of same and equal.
I read the articles that were written against your shirts and then I saw your heartbreaking apology via the link below.
I know that you will probably never read this but I wanted to say to you SORRY. The women who wrote those articles and who agree with it are wrong in every single way. There is nothing wrong with a shirt that celebrates women but there is something wrong with judging the person wearing that shirt and judging that shirt only by appearance.
I am not a feminist BUT feminism is supposed to be about accepting ALL women and men. It shouldnt be that women who look like the ones on your shirt are rejected or seen as more sexual, it should be that all women are equal and so it should be okay for you to wear a shirt with whatever image you choose.
It shouldnt be that you or your shirt are judged before even talking to you about your views on women, objectification and science. The people who lynched you are ass holes and they are not very bright either. They claim your t-shirt is the reason women arent in science yet no scientist have worn that t-shirt in the past and women still arent as much a part of science as they would like.
Don’t cry over them please, dont feel sad over them please. These are mostly women who have had bad relationships with men and as result do not like men, and men who are afraid to disagree with pussy. Chin up, you have my full support to wear that shirt everyday for the rest of your life.
And congrats on all the work you and your team are doing 😛 Also if you are a feminist and do agree with objectification and all that they are saying please think about it some more. These ideas really dont add up.