Why I think we need to fight for the Patriarchy.
We are in a transition from a traditional society (let’s call it the patriarchy) to a liberal-minded society (let’s call it a matriarchy). Men suffer quite a lot in this transition, because the laws are essentially all very patriarchal and women still expect things like child-support (something which would normally only exist in a patriarchy), while they behave as though they are in a matriarchy (wanting to sleep around and still be respected, etc.).
Now the patriarchy is actually not a society that favors men over women, and the matriarchy is not a society which favors women over men. Both societies favor men and women equally. I know a lot of MRAs do not believe this and use the draft as evidence that the patriarchy favored women more, but that is not true. The patriarchy is actually a society that favors children, while the matriarchy favors the individual (or self).
The patriarchy is a child-centered society. It is interested in birth and survival rates of children, and that is why males were drafted. Male disposability led to more children. The patriarchy comes from difficult times, it was born in hard times, it is a very social system, an efficient system, and it’s a survival mechanism.
We know it leads to successful societies because many of the major cultures that dominate the world today have a patriarchal history. And we can see this most clearly through the fact that the world’s major religions like Christianity, Islam, Hinduism and Confucianism all come from cultures which support the patriarchy. All of these religions and the cultures that support them speak of female obedience to her husband and male responsibility and dominance over to his family.
Most of the world’s major cultures have patriarchal roots, this is a map showing the major religions of each country as it was in 1960. It is taken from Hans Rosling’s talk on religion and babies.
Since people who share the same religion also often share common cultural practices with respect to structuring family life, and the cultures associated with the major religions in the picture above are all patriarchal, we can see that the patriarchal way of structuring society has had a lot of success.
The matriarchy–and I feel like I have lived in one, which is Jamaica–is a “matriarchal” society within a patriarchal setting. It is not a very social system, and is in fact very inefficient. It works when resources are abundant and easy to access and it works on the principal that everyone just does what is best for themselves. What happens in such a society is that men do not take care of or even know their kids. Women work and take all the steady, easy and good jobs. Men, who only need to take care of themselves, take the unstable and unreliable jobs, the hard jobs.
Men and women do not live together and do not seek to form relationships. They just come together for sex. Gender roles still exist, but male female interaction is more limited so they only exist pre-sex. Typically males compete for female attention and have to offer women something material in order to get sex. The thing is, though, in this system most women are attracted to the same men and those men get the most sex.
Now I know a lot of people will disagree with me, but in part male/female relations are actually a trade with sex being the commodity. In any sexual act the person with the most at stake is the female. Putting aside unfair laws and child support which actually came from the patriarchy. The woman is the one who might get pregnant when the act is over, she might end up with a child, while the man ends up with no consequence beyond sex. That sets things up so that men are always seeking sex from women.
Now essentially without science we can define women and men by saying women make babies and feed infants, and men do not make babies or feed infants, freeing them up to do other things with their time. This sets things up so that women are more limited than men with respect to their access to resources. So with men in need of sex and women in need of rare or hard to get resources, in both the patriarchy and the matriarchy, this trade takes place.
Marriage was a trade of sex (and access to one’s children) for male work (less limited work). In the matriarchy that same trade occurs (minus access to one’s children) but on a short term basis. The traditional system is a much more social system because it shares the sex and male work equally, while the matriarchal does not. I think the majority of people can actually benefit from the traditional system. There are some who will do better in the matriarchal system, but the majority does better in the patriarchy. So we need to maintain that balance and so we need to fight for the patriarchy to stay.
Humans are social beings. The social part of us causes most of us to follow the crowd and to fit into whatever we identify as the pattern (whether that pattern is to be weird, to be liberal, to be odd, or to fit in). The social part of our psychology causes society to trend either to traditionalism in an extreme form or to liberalism in an extreme form. We have to fight so that society does not end up on the extremely liberal side, so that we have balance.
The picture below shows how I think the cycle between the matriarchy and the patriarchy works, I do not mean to imply that any one society is fully matriarchal or fully patriarchal, because in fact I think there are layers from both sides in every society. The idea of a central government and taxes for example is a social system and it exists in many capitalist settings. I think society takes the parts from the self-centered society that it can, while using the parts of the society-centered society that are necessary.
What I do mean to imply is that many parts of the traditional way of structuring society are beneficial to the majority of society, and so I think we should hold on to them. The patriarchy has been successful for many reasons, and we have to be careful not to ignore some of these reasons. Male investment and access to their offspring both in the form of being a role model who would love, guide, and seek the best interests of their children and through their economic contributions benefited society enormously. Allowing women the freedom to focus on producing and caring for children also benefited society.
The patriarchy as we know it was not perfect, but neither is a matriarchy, and so I think we as a society need to start sifting through both systems, and it is important that as we do this we keep the parts of the patriarchal ways of structuring society that were, and can still be, beneficial to individuals and society.
The above was also posted at Return of the Kings Blog.
The definition of feminism is
fem·i·nism /ˈfeməˌnizəm/: The advocacy of women’s rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men.
The problem with this idea is that women and men are biologically different. Essentially without science we can define women and men by saying women make babies and feed infants and men do not make babies or feed infants freeing them up to do other things with their time. Because of these biological differences we generally do different things socially, politically and economically and that should be okay because it is great for individuals and great for society on many levels.
Even though science now blurs these differences and one day we may evolve out of these differences at present we are still very different. The feminist idea of equality harms society because it deprives society of the structure needed for children to find role models and children are the future society. Using the feminist definition of equality children are taught that men and women can be interchangeable, this is inefficient and since children naturally seek role models along sexist lines this provides a platform for biology structure society; it takes us back to a hunter gatherer type of society where males are marginalized.
The feminist model of equality can easily end the same way a lack of traditional values in black post-slavery communities ended. Boys will be unable to find proper male role models in their homes and will seek role models in society only to find companies or people that wish to use them and encourage them to do things that do not benefit them or society.
The traditional model of society is also better than the liberal model that feminist encourage because while both models allow us to find individual happiness the traditional model leads to
a more productive society(this is false read this change of view post). The liberal model causes people to be potentially more happy as it is fully compatible with our biology unlike the traditional model which encourages fidelity, however society gains much more with the traditional model and individuals benefit from that as well.
But it really depends on the person. For many people the traditional model will work better than the liberal model though; it benefits women because they can focus on their children, it benefits children because they get lots of attention and benefit from the investments that fathers make to their children and from having male role-models who love them, and it benefits men through making them a part of the family unit and giving them access to their kids, it also means that they do not have to compete as much to get sex.
50/50 custody would change all of what I am saying. So if we cannot save marriage can we please PLEASE introduce 50/50 custody. It is the most important thing worth campaigning for in our time. Men need to start taking equal responsibility for children. Even if women do not want it. Even if we have to create a genetic bank to find the fathers of children. Speak out and campaign for 50/50 custody!
or Maybe we needed a female independence movement to get women to establish their place in the working world only to later change the working world? Maybe feminism is a part of societal evolution. Women will have less and less kids until we start to value motherhood and parenthood and then some will start too have kids again, and to prioritize them and to work only part time. Maybe all this consumerism and societies ”hatred” of children will lead us to a society that values children more.